stephanzych services

Senior engineering, where it's hardest.

A small number of things, done at a senior level — from technical direction down to the code itself. STEPHANZYCH is brought in for architecture, leadership, delivery, and the independent calls that decide whether a build succeeds.

capabilities

Capability areas.

leadership

Technical leadership & delivery

For
Teams that need senior direction, stronger technical decisions, and reliable progress.
Work
Set technical direction, make the hard architectural calls, unblock delivery, and stay close enough to the code to keep the decisions honest.
Outcome
Decisions get made, work ships on a cadence people trust, and the team carries the standard after I leave.

architecture

Architecture & platform evolution

For
Existing systems that need to become easier to understand, change, operate, and scale.
Work
Map what's really there, expose the constraints, and evolve the architecture in shippable steps — not a big-bang rewrite.
Outcome
A system that's cheaper to change, safer to operate, and ready for the next stage of growth.

product

Product engineering

For
Teams building substantial digital products, from early technical direction through production.
Work
Own the build end to end — interface, application, and the APIs and infrastructure underneath — with a plan up front and a working product at the end.
Outcome
A real product in production, documented and owned by you, not a prototype that needs rescuing.

audit

Audit, advisory & due diligence

For
Organisations that need an independent technical view before an expensive decision.
Work
Assess the codebase, architecture, team, or proposed plan, and report findings and recommendations you can act on straight away.
Outcome
A clear, defensible read on risk and a recommendation — extend, rebuild, invest, or walk away.

enablement

Team enablement

For
Teams that want stronger engineering practice, workflow, and technical ownership.
Work
Improve how the team builds — code quality, review, tooling, and delivery workflow — through hands-on work on their own codebase, not slideware.
Outcome
A team that ships with more confidence and needs less rescuing over time.

services

Concretely, the work.

Tool-agnostic by default — the right tool for the problem, not the familiar one.

  • TypeScript
  • Node.js
  • Next.js
  • Nuxt
  • Laravel
  • WordPress
  • Docker
  • AWS
  • DigitalOcean
  • CI/CD
  • Git

full-stack

Full-stack development

Teams that need a senior engineer who can build the whole thing, not just one layer.

Web platforms built end to end — interface, application, and the APIs underneath — with TypeScript, Next, Nuxt, Laravel, or WordPress where they fit, and whatever else the job actually calls for.

Production software, documented and owned by you.

devops

DevOps & cloud

Teams whose deploys are slow, manual, or scary.

Docker, CI/CD, and cloud infrastructure on AWS or DigitalOcean — deployment pipelines and environments that ship themselves and stay up.

Releases that are routine instead of an event.

consulting

Technical leadership & consulting

Teams facing decisions that a permanent CTO hire would be too much for.

A senior pair of hands on the hard calls: architecture, technical direction, and the trade-offs that decide whether a build succeeds or stalls.

Decisions made and owned, with someone accountable for the trade-offs.

code-audit

Audit & due diligence

Investors weighing a deal, or founders deciding whether to extend or rebuild.

An independent read on a codebase, architecture, or team, delivered as findings and recommendations you can act on — not a vague score.

A clear, defensible basis for an expensive decision.

training

Training & enablement

Teams that want to level up their engineering practice for good.

Hands-on sessions built around a team's own codebase — language, tooling, workflow, and the practices that make change cheaper.

A team that ships with more confidence and needs less rescuing.

not-sure

Something else?

Tell me what you're trying to ship and we'll work out the right shape together. Discuss a project →

how-engagements-work

Three ways to work together.

Same senior person, three commercial shapes — split by whether you need me ongoing or for a defined piece of work, and whether you need something built or assessed.

embedded

Embedded technical leadership

Ongoing · retainer or set days per week

I join your team as its senior engineer and technical lead — and stay. Think fractional CTO or interim lead: I set direction, make the hard calls, and keep shipping alongside the team, for as long as it's useful and without a permanent hire. You're buying direction and continuity, not a single deliverable.

Best for

  • Delivery recovery
  • Architecture evolution
  • Team guidance
  • Product or platform ownership

project

Focused project delivery

Fixed scope · defined timeline

You have one specific thing that has to get built. I scope it, own it end to end — architecture to launch — and hand back a working product, with a clear plan up front instead of a pile of unknowns. It has a start and an end.

Best for

  • New platforms
  • Critical features
  • Technical foundations
  • Complex migrations

advisory

Audit, advisory & due diligence

Fixed scope · days to a few weeks

You need an independent expert read before a decision — not a long build. I assess the codebase, architecture, team, or proposed plan and give you findings and recommendations you can act on straight away.

Best for

  • Risk assessment
  • Architecture review
  • Rewrite decisions
  • Vendor or project review
  • Delivery bottlenecks

Start a conversation